Tripura High Court

Crl.Petn./44/2026 of SRI KARTIK KUMAR KUNDU Vs The State of Tripura on 15 June 2026

2026:THC:740

( 2026:THC:740) ) HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA Crl. Petn. No. 44 of 2026 Sri Kartik Kumar Kundu, S/o Late Haripada Kundu, C/o Dr. Shyamal Sarkar, Of Ramnagar Road No.05, P.O. Ramnagar, PS-West Agartala, District- West Tripura-799002. ---- Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura

TRHC010009382026 ( 2026:THC:740)

)

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA

AGARTALA

Crl. Petn. No. 44 of 2026

Sri Kartik Kumar Kundu,

S/o Late Haripada Kundu,

C/o Dr. Shyamal Sarkar,

Of Ramnagar Road No.05, P.O. Ramnagar,

PS-West Agartala, District- West Tripura-799002.

---- Petitioner(s)

Versus

The State of Tripura

----Respondent(s)

For Petitioner (s)

:

Mr. Kabrabam Dhirendra Singha, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Raju Datta, PP.

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT

Order

15/06/2026

Page 1 of 2

Heard Learned Counsel Mr. K D Singha, appearing for the petitioner and also heard Learned PP Mr. R Datta, appearing for the State respondent. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 is filed for directing the State-respondent to take necessary action against the accused in connection with West Agartala P.S. case No.2025 WAG 034 dated 09.04.2025 under Sections 420/407/423/120(B) of IPC.

Taking part in the hearing, Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforesaid case is pending before the Court of Ld. CJM, West Tripura, Agartala and in that case the accused sought for pre-arrest bail which was allowed by Learned Addl. Sessions Judge, West Tripura, Agartala, Court No.4 by order

TRHC010009382026 ( 2026:THC:740) )

dated 17.04.2025 in BA 62/2025 and thereafter, a petition was moved on behalf of the petitioner before this High Court for cancellation of the bail granted to the respondent accused and this Court by order dated 02.08.2025 passed in BA No. 43/2025 was pleased to set aside and cancel the order passed by Ld. Addl. Sessions Judge, West Tripura, Agartala. After that the respondent accused approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court and by order dated 15.01.2026 in SLP Crl. No. 16543/2025 the petition filed was dismissed and the interim protection granted was withdrawn. According to the Learned Counsel, till today no chargesheet has been submitted in this case and no step has been taken from the side of the prosecuting agency to arrest the accused in this case.

Learned PP Mr. Datta, submitted that until and unless the petitioner approaches the Court of Ld. CJM, there is no scope to grant any relief.

I also concede with the submission of Learned PP.

Accordingly, I find no merit in this petition. Hence the same is thus dismissed.

However, liberty is given to the petitioner to approach the concerned Jurisdictional Magistrate for passing appropriate order. With this observation, this petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE `Satabdi SATABDI DUTTA Digitally signed by SATABDI DUTTA Date: 2026.06.16 13:01:36 +05'30'

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead