Tripura High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/21/2026 of Zakir Hossain Vs Dr. Milind Dharmreo Ramteke, IAS and Anr on 18 May 2026
2026:THC:636
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA Cont. Cas(C) 21 of 2026 Zakir Hossain, S/O. Nurul Islam of South Charilam, P.O Charilam, Bishalgarh, Sepahijala, Tripura. .......... Applicant VERSUS 1. Dr. Milind Dharmreo Ramteke, IAS The Secretary to the Department of Education, Government of Tripura, Civil
TRHC010008452026
2026:THC:636
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
Cont. Cas(C) 21 of 2026
Zakir Hossain,
S/O. Nurul Islam of South Charilam, P.O Charilam, Bishalgarh, Sepahijala, Tripura.
.......... Applicant
VERSUS
1. Dr. Milind Dharmreo Ramteke, IAS
The Secretary to the Department of Education, Government of Tripura, Civil Secretariat Complex, P.O. New Capital Complex, Kunjaban, Agartala, West Tripura, PIN 799010
2. Shri Rajib Datta, IAS
The Director of Elementary Education, Government of Tripura, Agartala, P.O. Agartala, P.S. West Agartala, District West Tripura, PIN-799001.
………....Respondents.
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sankar Kr. Deb, Sr. Advocate.
Mr. S. Datta. Advocate
For Respondent(s) :
None.
HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD
ORDER
18.05.2026
Heard.
This present Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India for drawing up contempt proceeding against the respondent-contemnors for non-compliance with the direction of this Court dated 28.05.2025 passed in W.P.(C) No.291 of 2025.
Page 1 of 2
It is submitted by Mr. Sankar Kr. Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Datta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that in compliance with the order dated 28.05.2025 passed by this Court in WP(C) No.291 of 2025, the case of the petitioner has been decided and reliefs sought for by the petitioner have been considered in part. Accordingly, there survives nothing for adjudication in this present contempt case.
In view of the above, this present Contempt Petition is closed. However, in the event, if the petitioner is further aggrieved by the decision made by the respondents, he shall be at liberty to challenge the decision by preferring fresh proceedings.
As a sequel, miscellaneous application(s), pending if any, shall stand closed.
Dr. T. AMARNATH GOUD, J.
Paritosh
+05'30'
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…