Tripura High Court

WP(C)/99/2026 of M/S DYSNIELAND MELA (OPC) PVT. LTD Vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND 3 OTHERS on 15 May 2026

2026:THC:623

TRHC010002212026 2026:THC:623 HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) NO.99 OF 2026 1. M/S DYSNIELAND MELA(OPC) PVT. LTD., ( A registered Company under the Companies Act, 2013) Having its Registered Office at: Panbari Road, Ward no.7, Kharupetia Dist.: Darrang, Assam. PIN: 784115, Being represented

TRHC010002212026 2026:THC:623

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA

AGARTALA

WP(C) NO.99 OF 2026

1. M/S DYSNIELAND MELA(OPC) PVT. LTD.,

(A registered Company under the Companies Act, 2013)

Having its Registered Office at:

Panbari Road, Ward no.7, Kharupetia Dist.: Darrang, Assam.

PIN: 784115, Being represented by its Director.

2. SHAMIM SHAIKH,

S/O: Late M.D Ilyas,

Director of M/S Dysnieland Mela (OPC) Pvt. Ltd.

Panbari Road, Ward no.7, Kharupetia

Dist.: Darrang, Assam. PIN: 784115

…….Petitioner(s)

-Versus-

1. THE STATE OF TRIPURA,

Represented by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt. of Tripura, Department of Youth Affairs & Sports, Agartala, West Tripura.

PIN-799001

2. TRIPURA SPORTS COUNCIL

Represented by its Chairman,

NSRCC, N.S. Road,

Agartala West Tripura. PIN-799001

3. THE SECRETARY,

Tripura Sports Council, NSRCC, N.S. Road, Agartala West Tripura. PIN-

799001.

4. M/S UNIVERSAL ADVERTISEMENT

Agartala Address: Shankar Chowmuhani,

Ramnagar Road No. 4, Agartala, West Tripura, PIN: 799002

Also having an address at:

S.U.Market, Fatashil Main Road, Near RCC Bridge, Guwahati, Assam.

PIN: 781009.

.....Respondent(s)

Page 1 of 2

Present:

For the Petitioner(s)

: Mr. D.P. Ghosh, Advocate.

Mr. M. Das, Advocate.

Mr. E.L. Darlong, Advocate.

Mr. N. Alam, Advocate.

Mr. N. Das, Advocate.

Mr. S.H. Roy, Advocate.

Mr. J. Das, Advocate.

For the Respondent(s)

: Mr. P. Gautam, Sr. G.A.

Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharyya, G.A.

15.05.2026

HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD

Order

1. When the case is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Mr. P. Gautam, learned Sr. G.A., appearing on behalf of learned G.A., for the respondents submits that the exhibition duration sought to be established in Vivekananda Maiden is over and nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition.

3. It is seen from the record that the petitioner approached the respondents-authorities seeking for allotment of Vivekananda Maiden for conducting exhibition ending by 1st March 2026.

4. In view of the same, since by the elapse of time no cause of action survives, accordingly, this present writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGE

suhanjit RAJKUMAR SUHANJIT SINGHA Digitally signed by RAJKUMAR SUHANJIT SINGHA Date: 2026.05.16 12:35:41 +05'30'

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead