Tripura High Court
WP(C)/99/2026 of M/S DYSNIELAND MELA (OPC) PVT. LTD Vs THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND 3 OTHERS on 15 May 2026
2026:THC:623
TRHC010002212026 2026:THC:623 HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) NO.99 OF 2026 1. M/S DYSNIELAND MELA(OPC) PVT. LTD., ( A registered Company under the Companies Act, 2013) Having its Registered Office at: Panbari Road, Ward no.7, Kharupetia Dist.: Darrang, Assam. PIN: 784115, Being represented
TRHC010002212026 2026:THC:623
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
WP(C) NO.99 OF 2026
1. M/S DYSNIELAND MELA(OPC) PVT. LTD.,
(A registered Company under the Companies Act, 2013)
Having its Registered Office at:
Panbari Road, Ward no.7, Kharupetia Dist.: Darrang, Assam.
PIN: 784115, Being represented by its Director.
2. SHAMIM SHAIKH,
S/O: Late M.D Ilyas,
Director of M/S Dysnieland Mela (OPC) Pvt. Ltd.
Panbari Road, Ward no.7, Kharupetia
Dist.: Darrang, Assam. PIN: 784115
…….Petitioner(s)
-Versus-
1. THE STATE OF TRIPURA,
Represented by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt. of Tripura, Department of Youth Affairs & Sports, Agartala, West Tripura.
PIN-799001
2. TRIPURA SPORTS COUNCIL
Represented by its Chairman,
NSRCC, N.S. Road,
Agartala West Tripura. PIN-799001
3. THE SECRETARY,
Tripura Sports Council, NSRCC, N.S. Road, Agartala West Tripura. PIN-
799001.
4. M/S UNIVERSAL ADVERTISEMENT
Agartala Address: Shankar Chowmuhani,
Ramnagar Road No. 4, Agartala, West Tripura, PIN: 799002
Also having an address at:
S.U.Market, Fatashil Main Road, Near RCC Bridge, Guwahati, Assam.
PIN: 781009.
.....Respondent(s)
Page 1 of 2
Present:
For the Petitioner(s)
: Mr. D.P. Ghosh, Advocate.
Mr. M. Das, Advocate.
Mr. E.L. Darlong, Advocate.
Mr. N. Alam, Advocate.
Mr. N. Das, Advocate.
Mr. S.H. Roy, Advocate.
Mr. J. Das, Advocate.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. P. Gautam, Sr. G.A.
Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharyya, G.A.
15.05.2026
HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD
Order
1. When the case is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Mr. P. Gautam, learned Sr. G.A., appearing on behalf of learned G.A., for the respondents submits that the exhibition duration sought to be established in Vivekananda Maiden is over and nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition.
3. It is seen from the record that the petitioner approached the respondents-authorities seeking for allotment of Vivekananda Maiden for conducting exhibition ending by 1st March 2026.
4. In view of the same, since by the elapse of time no cause of action survives, accordingly, this present writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGE
suhanjit RAJKUMAR SUHANJIT SINGHA Digitally signed by RAJKUMAR SUHANJIT SINGHA Date: 2026.05.16 12:35:41 +05'30'
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…