Tripura High Court

CRP/2/2026 of Sri Prasenjit Deb Vs Smt. Priya Majumder (Deb) on 27 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA CRP No.02/2026 Sri Prasenjit Deb, S/O. Sri Ajoy Deb, Resident of Uttar Maheshpur, P.S.- Jatrapur, Dist-Sepahijala, Tripura. ……… Petitioner(s). V E R S U S Smt. Priya Majumder (Deb), W/O. Sri Prasenjit Deb, D/O. Sri Bishweshwar Majumder, Presently

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA

AGARTALA

CRP No.02/2026

Sri Prasenjit Deb, S/O. Sri Ajoy Deb, Resident of Uttar Maheshpur, P.S.- Jatrapur, Dist-Sepahijala, Tripura.

……… Petitioner(s).

V E R S U S

Smt. Priya Majumder (Deb), W/O. Sri Prasenjit Deb, D/O. Sri Bishweshwar Majumder, Presently resided at Nidaya, Tindhepa, P.S.-Jatrapur, Dist.-Sepahijala, Tripura.

………Respondent(s).

For Petitioner(s)

: Ms. Uttara Singha, Advocate.

For Respondent(s)

: Mr. Dipak Deb, Advocate,

Mr. Diptanu Debnath, Advocate.

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

27/03/2026

Heard both sides.

2. This Revision is filed challenging the order dt.12.12.2025 of the Judge, Family Court, Sonamura, Sepahijala Tripura closing the evidence for the plaintiff in T.S. (Div.) No.02 of 2024 on the ground that the petitioner was not present and had not taken any step for cross-examination of certain witnesses, who had deposed on his behalf or who had to appear for cross-examination.

3. The Court below, in my opinion, should have granted one more opportunity to the petitioner to take the appropriate step necessary to enable cross-examination of his witnesses, who had to be cross-examined, instead of closing the evidence on 12.12.2025 on that pretext.

4. Therefore, this Revision is allowed. The order dt.12.12.2025 of the Judge, Family Court, Sonamura, Sepahijala Tripura is set aside and the Court below is directed to give opportunity to the petitioner to take the necessary steps for cross-examination of the remaining witnesses for the petitioner by the other side on 18.04.2026.

5. The Revision Petition is disposed of.

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, CJ)

Pulak PULAK BANIK Digitally signed by PULAK BANIK Date: 2026.03.30 13:34:29 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead