Tripura High Court
WP(C)/145/2026 of Shri Bhabani Sarkar Vs The State of Tripura and 3 others on 25 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C)No.145 of 2026 Shri Bhabani Sarkar, S/O- Late Prangopal Sarkar, Resident of Hrishi Arbinda Palli, Amarpur, P.S- Birganj, District- Gomati, Tripura, PIN - 799101 ….Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Tripura represented by the Secretary, Department of
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
WP(C)No.145 of 2026
Shri Bhabani Sarkar, S/O- Late Prangopal Sarkar, Resident of Hrishi Arbinda Palli, Amarpur, P.S- Birganj, District- Gomati, Tripura, PIN - 799101
….Petitioner(s)
Versus
1.The State of Tripura represented by the Secretary, Department of Panchayat, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Complex, Agartala, West Tripura.
2.The Director of Panchayat, Government of Tripura, Agartala, West Tripura.
3.The District Magistrate and Collector, Gomati District, Udaipur, Tripura.
4.The Block Development Officer, Amarpur Rural Development Block, Gomati District, Tripura.
….Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Samar Das, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Dipankar Sarma, Addl.GA.
Date of hearing and
:
25.03.2026
Dlivery of Judgment/
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
Whether fit for reporting :
=B=E=F=O=R=E= HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA Judgment and order (Oral)
Heard Ld. Counsel of both sides.
With consent of both sides, this writ petition is being disposed of as agreed by the parties at this motion stage.
The petitioner went on superannuation as Panchayat Supervisor on attaining the age of 60 years on 30.11.2025. But his post retiral benefits have not been released to him till date. In this Yes No
regard he submitted a representation on 17.02.2026 (Annexure-3) to Respondent No.4, but same has also not been responded by the respondents despite one month has elapsed.
Ld. Counsel, Mr. Samar Das, for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of said representation in a time bound manner.
Ld. Addl. GA, Mr. D. Sarma, representing all the respondents has not opposed the same.
In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 17.02.2026 (Annexure-3) of the petitioner in accordance with law within 1(one) month of receipt of the copy of this Judgment.
With such direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
Interim Application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
Saikat Sarma +05'30'