Tripura High Court

WP(C)/658/2024 of Sri Amar Banik Vs The State of Tripura and 3 others on 14 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF TRIPURA AGARTALA W.P.(C) No.658 of 2024 Sri Amar Banik S/O- Lt Santosh Banik, R/O Vill- Krishnapur, P.O- Matai, P.S- Belonia, Dist- South Tripura, PIN- 799155, Aged about- 44 years. -----Petitioner(s) V e r s u s 1. The State of Tripura Represented by its Principal Secretary, School

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA

AGARTALA

W.P.(C) No.658 of 2024

Sri Amar Banik

S/O- Lt Santosh Banik, R/O Vill- Krishnapur, P.O- Matai, P.S- Belonia, Dist- South Tripura, PIN- 799155, Aged about- 44 years.

-----Petitioner(s)

V e r s u s

1. The State of Tripura

Represented by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. of Tripura, P.O- Secretariat, P.S- New Capital Complex, Dist- West Tripura, PIN – 799010

2. The Director of Secondary Education,

Directorate of Secondary Education, Govt. of Tripura, P.O- Agartala, P.S- West Agartala, Dist- West Tripura, PIN - 799001

3. The Joint Director,

Directorate of Secondary Education, Govt. of Tripura, P.O- Agartala, P.S- West Agartala, Dist- West Tripura, PIN – 799001

4. The Secretary

Finance

Department,

Govt.

of

Tripura,

P.O-

Secretariat, P.S- New Capital Complex, Dist- West Tripura, PIN - 799010

-----Respondent(s)

For Petitioner (s)

:

None

For Respondent(s)

:

None

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

14.03.2026

The case has been taken up in the National Lok Adalat today. Both the parties are present. After conciliation, they have arrived at the settlement in the following terms: The matter was discussed and conciliated between the parties and it is found that it is a matter of reimbursement of medical bill for a petty amount of Rs.1,19,495/- [Rupees One lakh Nineteen thousands Four hundred Ninety Five] only for treatment of CA(Cancer). Considering all these aspects, it is settled that the petitioner shall file an application afresh within 10 days from today for claiming his amount incurred for treatment with all necessary papers [Xerox copies]

Sujay

through the Headmaster/in-charge Headmaster of Lankamura H.S. School, who shall forward the same to the Director of Secondary Education, Government of Tripura and the Director of Secondary Education shall settle the matter within 1[one] month on receipt of the application from the petitioner in regard to whether the petitioner is entitled for reimbursement of the medical bill of above said amount etc. and shall communicate the decision to the petitioner through Headmaster/In-charge Headmaster of Lankamura H.S. School. It is made clear that if in case any dissatisfaction by the petitioner, he shall approach the Court afresh for his claim. With this order, the matter is finally settled.”

The terms of settlement are reduced into writing and signed by the parties and the conciliators. The same may be kept in the record. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the above said terms and conditions. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

JUDGE

SUJAY GHOSH Digitally signed by SUJAY GHOSH Date: 2026.03.16 17:18:52 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead