Tripura High Court

WP(C)/156/2026 of Indrajit Hazari Vs The State of Tripura and 4 Ors. on 12 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) 156 of 2026 Indrajit Hazari, S/o Late Dhirendra Kumar Hazari, resident of village & PO Ishanchandranagar, Sub-Division- Belonia, District- South Tripuura. ……….Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Tripura, Represented by the Commissioner &

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA

AGARTALA

WP(C) 156 of 2026

Indrajit Hazari,

S/o Late Dhirendra Kumar Hazari, resident of village & PO

Ishanchandranagar, Sub-Division- Belonia, District- South Tripuura.

……….Petitioner(s)

Versus

1.

The State of Tripura,

Represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Revenue Department, Govt. of Tripura, New Secretariat Complex, Gurkhabasti, Agartala, P.O Kunjaban, PS- New Capital Complex. Sub-Division –

Sadar, District- Tripura West.

2.

The District Magistrate & Collector, South Tripura District, Government of Tripura, Belonia, PO & PS-Belonia, District- South Tripura.

3.

The

Sub-Divisional

Magistrate,

Belonia

Sub-Division,

Government of Tripura, PO & PS- Belonia, District- South Tripura.

4.

The Deputy Collector & Magistrate, Belonia, Government of Tripura, PO & PS- Belonia, District- South Tripura.

...Official Respondents

5.

Sri Sanjit Banik @ Sri Sanjit Hazari, son of Late Dhirendra Banik, resident of Belonia, near Ramthakur Ashram, Ward No. 1, PO &

PS- Belonia, District- South Tripura.

…....Private Respondent

For the Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate.

Mr. Koomar Chakraborty, Advocate.

For the Respondent(s)

:

Mr. D. Sarma, Addl.G.A.

BEFORE

HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

12.03.2026

Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.

This present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs: <(i) Issue Rule, calling upon the Respondents and each one of them. to show cause as to why a Writ of Certiorari and/or in the nature thereof. shall not be issued, directing them, to transmit the records, lying with them, for rendering substantive and conscionable justice to the Petitioner;

(ii) Issue Rule, calling upon the Respondents and each one of them, to show cause as to why a Writ of Mandamus and/or in the nature thereof, shall not be issued, mandating/directing them, more particularly, the Respondent No.2 herein, i.e., the District Magistrate & Collector. South Tripura District, Belonia, South Tripura to dispose of the Second Appeal dated 19.05.2025 as preferred by the Petitioner, under Section 93(2)(a) of the Tripura Land Revenue & Land Reforms Act, 1960, assailing the Order dated 30.04.2025 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Belonia Sub- Division, South Tripura, in connection with the Appeal dated 07.09.2024, preferred by the Petitioner, against an Order dated 16.08.2024, passed by the Deputy Collector & Magistrate, Belonia, South Tripura, Agartala, in connection with the Application dated 15.05.2024, filed by the Petitioner, for cancellation of mutation, granted in favour of the Respondent;

(iii) Call for the records, appertaining to this Writ Petition;

(iv) After hearing the parties, be pleased to make the Rule absolute in terms of (i) & (ii) above;

(v) Costs of and incidental to this proceeding.=

Upon perusal of the record, it has been seen that the petitioner herein filed a second appeal dated 19.05.2025 before the court of learned DM & Collector, South Tripura District, ventilating his grievances, but the same is pending for adjudication.

In view of the same, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this present writ petition is disposed of directing the concerned respondent(s) to consider the matter, more particularly in light of the second appeal dated 19.05.2025 filed by the petitioner and take a decision preferably within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order in accordance with law.

With the above observation and direction, this present writ petition stands disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous application(s), pending if any, shall stand closed.

DR. T.AMARNATH GOUD,J

Paritosh +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead