Tripura High Court

Cont.Cas(C)/61/2025 of Smt. Satarupa Nama (Das) Vs Dr. Pradeep Kumar Chakraborty and Ors on 10 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF TRIPURA AGARTALA Cont.Cas(C). No.61 of 2025 Smt. Satarupa Nama (Das), W/o.- Sujan Das, D/o. Lt. Sushil Chandra Nama, R/O- Chelagang, P.O. Chelagang, P.S.- Nutun Bazar, Karbook, Gomati, Tripura. ….Petitioner(s) Versus 1.Dr. Pradeep Kumar Chakraborty to be represented by the Secretary,

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA

AGARTALA

Cont.Cas(C). No.61 of 2025

Smt. Satarupa Nama (Das), W/o.- Sujan Das, D/o. Lt. Sushil Chandra Nama, R/O- Chelagang, P.O. Chelagang, P.S.- Nutun Bazar, Karbook, Gomati, Tripura.

….Petitioner(s)

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Dr. Pradeep Kumar Chakraborty to be represented by the Secretary, Department of Education, Govt of Tripura, New Secretariat Building, New Capital Complex, Kunjaban, P.S.- New Capital Complex, Agartala, West Tripura, PIN- 799010

2. Shri Rajib Dutta, Directorate of Elementary Education, Govt. of Tripura, Shiksha Bhavan, Office Lane, Agartala, Tripura, PIN- 799001.

3. Shri Apurba Roy, Department of Finance, Govt. of Tripura, New Secretariat Building, New Capital Complex, Kunjaban, P.S- New Capital Complex, Agartala, West Tripura, Pin – 799010

4. Shri Arajit Debbarma, Sub-Divisional Magistrate Karbook, Gomati, District, Tripura.

….Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s)

: Mr. P.Roy Barman,Sr. Advocate.

Mr Samarjit Bhattacharjee,Advocate.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. K.De, Addl.GA.

=B=E=F=O=R=E= HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA =O=R=D=E=R=

10.03.2026

Heard Ld. Counsel of both sides.

Ld. Addl. GA, Mr. K. De has placed a copy of memorandum dated 09.03.2026, whereby the petitioner has been offered with appointment to the post of Lower Division Clerk under Die-in-Harness scheme. In such a situation Ld. Counsel of the petitioner does not press the contempt petition further.

Considered.

The Contempt petition is closed being not pressed.

Interim Application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

JUDGE

Saikat Sarma RUDRADEEP BANERJEE Digitally signed by RUDRADEEP BANERJEE Date: 2026.03.10 18:03:03 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead