Tripura High Court
Crl.L.P./2/2025 of SMT. JAYANTI SINGHA ROY Vs SRI SAROP NATH AND ANR on 9 March 2026
of 2 HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA Crl. L. P. No.2 of 2025 In Crl.A. No.8 of 2025 Smt. Jayanti Singha Roy, W/O. Sri Sujan Chakraborty, R/O. School Para Hadra, P.O: Kakraban, P.S: Kakraban, Dist: Gomati Tripura, Pin- 799105. ……Petitioner(s). V e r s u s 3. Sri Sarop Nath, C/O. Sri
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
Crl. L. P. No.2 of 2025
In Crl.A. No.8 of 2025
Smt. Jayanti Singha Roy,
W/O. Sri Sujan Chakraborty,
R/O. School Para Hadra, P.O: Kakraban,
P.S: Kakraban, Dist: Gomati Tripura, Pin- 799105.
……Petitioner(s).
V e r s u s
3. Sri Sarop Nath,
C/O. Sri Adhir Nath,
R/O. Vill: Subhash Nagar, P.O: Kanchanpur, P.S: Kanchanpur, Dist: North Tripura, Pin: 799270.
4. The State of Tripura,
Represented by the Secretary,
Department of Home, Agartala, West Tripura.
……Respondent(s).
For Petitioner (s)
:
Mr. Debajit Biswas, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Raju Datta, PP.
Ms. Saswati Nag, Advocate.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
09/03/2026
Heard learned counsel of both sides.
Taking the Court to the paragraph No.41 of the impugned judgment, Mr. Debajit Biswas, learned counsel submits that the learned Trial Court has wrongly appreciated the evidence and dismissed the case on the ground that the complainant did not have the capacity to advance any loan to the accused person.
Mr. Raju Datta, learned PP submits that he has no objection if the leave prayer is allowed and matter is taken up on merit for final hearing.
Ms. Saswati Nag, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1, submits that the learned Trial Court was justified in rejecting the case of the complainant and that no perversity has been committed by the learned Trial Court in appreciating the evidence.
Considered the submissions.
Perused the record.
As it appears, the matter is required to be heard on merit. Accordingly, the prayer for leave to appeal is allowed.
The Criminal Leave petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Dinashree MUNN A SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA Date: 2026.03.10 17:54:07 +05'30'