Tripura High Court
WP(C)/624/2025 of Sri Chandan Gope Vs The State of Tripura and 3 Others on 3 March 2026
COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) No.624 of 2025 Sri Chandan Gope Son of Late Manoranjan Gope, Resident of Santiniketan Para, South Jolaibari, South Tripura, Pin 799141. (Age-52 years) ---- Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Tripura, to be represented by the Secretary, Department of Education,
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
WP(C) No.624 of 2025
Sri Chandan Gope
Son of Late Manoranjan Gope,
Resident of Santiniketan Para, South Jolaibari, South Tripura, Pin 799141. (Age-52 years)
---- Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Tripura, to be represented by the Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Building, New Capital Complex, Agartala, West Tripura, PIN-799010.
2. The Director of Secondary Education, Government of Tripura, Shiksha Bhavan, Office Lane, Agartala, West Tripura.
3. The Headmaster, Avangachara H.S. School, Santirbazar, South Tripura.
4. The DEO, South Tripura District Education Office, Belonia, South Tripura.
----Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Purusuttam Roy Barman, Sr. Adv,
Ms. Aradhita Debbarma, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Pinki Chakraborty, Adv.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT
Order
03/03/2026
Learned Senior Counsel, Mr. Purusuttam Roy Barman assisted by Learned Counsel, Ms. Aradhita Debbarma is present on behalf of the petitioner.
The present petitioner has challenged the memo dated 18.10.2025 issued by the respondent-authority by which he was transferred from Avangchara H.S. School, Santirbazar, South Tripura to Sidhu Kanu Smriti School, Rajnagar, South Tripura.
This Court earlier granted time to the State- respondents to file counter affidavit. The State-respondents have not submitted their counter affidavit.
Page 1 of 2
However, today at the time of hearing, Learned Counsel, Ms. Pinki Chakraborty appearing on behalf of the State- respondents submitted that the State-respondents have withdrawn the order of transfer issued against the present petitioner by memorandum dated 06.11.2025. The copy of the same is also submitted to the Court.
Learned Counsel further submitted that since the order of transfer which was challenged in this writ petition has been withdrawn by the respondent-authority, so, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. As such, Learned Counsel urged for disposal of this writ petition.
Learned Senior Counsel, Mr. Roy Barman also shared the same view as of Learned Counsel, Ms. Pinki Chakraborty and submitted that this memorandum dated 06.11.2025, by which the order of transfer of the present petitioner was withdrawn, may be kept with the record and this writ petition may be disposed of.
In view of the above, this present writ petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Deepshikha MOUMITA DATTA Digitally signed by MOUMITA DATTA Date: 2026.03.05 16:23:30 -08'00'
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…