Tripura High Court

BA/33/2026 of Manjina Khatun for and behalf of Entaj Alam Vs The State of Tripura on 25 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA B.A. No.33 of 2026 Manjina Khatun, W/O- Entaj Alam, aged about 33 years, resident of Fanditpara, Mandalghat, Kudambinihut, P.S. Jalpaiguri, District- Jalpaiguri, West Bengal. For and on behalf of accused Entaj Alam, S/O- late Fafiz Uddin, aged about 39 years,

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA

AGARTALA

B.A. No.33 of 2026

Manjina Khatun, W/O- Entaj Alam, aged about 33 years, resident of Fanditpara, Mandalghat, Kudambinihut, P.S. Jalpaiguri, District- Jalpaiguri, West Bengal.

For and on behalf of accused

Entaj Alam, S/O- late Fafiz Uddin, aged about 39 years, resident of Fanditpara, Mandalghat, Kudambinihut, P.S. Jalpaiguri, District- Jalpaiguri, West Bengal.

…… Applicant(s).

V e r s u s

The State of Tripura

……Respondent(s).

For Applicant(s)

:

Mr. Debalay Bhattacharya, Senior Advocate.

Mr. Agniva Chakrabarti, Advocate.

Mr. Mijanur Rahaman, Advocate.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Raju Datta, PP.

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

25/02/2026

Heard Mr. Debalay Bhattacharya, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. Raju Datta, learned PP appearing for the State.

Mr. Datta, learned PP submits that charge-sheet has recently been submitted on 03.02.2026 alongwith a prayer for custody trial of the accused-petitioner.

In that circumstances, Mr. Bhattacharya, learned senior counsel submits that the applicant begs to withdraw this bail application with a liberty to approach this Court again, if aggrieved by the order of the learned Special Judge on the petition submitted by the Investigating Officer for custody trial of the accused-petitioner and for refusal of bail on that ground.

Considered.

Liberty as sought for is granted.

The bail application is disposed of being not pressed. .

JUDGE

Dinashree SUJAY GHOSH Digitally signed by SUJAY GHOSH Date: 2026.02.26 17:00:34 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead