Tripura High Court

WP(C)/86/2026 of Sri Uttam Kumar Saha Vs The State of Tripura and 5 Others on 12 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) 86 of 2026 Sri Uttam Kumar Saha, (aged about 52 Years) S/O- Late Anil Kumar Saha, Resident of Ranirbazar, P.S. Ranirbazar, District-West Tripura, Tripura, Pin-799035, …....... Petitioner. VERSUS 1. The State of Tripura, Represented by its Secretary. Revenue

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA

AGARTALA

WP(C) 86 of 2026

Sri Uttam Kumar Saha, (aged about 52 Years) S/O- Late Anil Kumar Saha, Resident of Ranirbazar, P.S. Ranirbazar, District-West Tripura, Tripura, Pin-799035,

…....... Petitioner.

VERSUS

1. The State of Tripura,

Represented by its Secretary. Revenue Department, Government of Tripura, New Capital Complex, P.O-Kunjaban, PS- New Capital Complex, Agartala, District-West Tripura, Pin-799010.

2. The District Magistrate and Collector.

West Tripura, Office at Agartala, near Office Lane, P.O-Agartala, PS- West Agartala, District- West Tripura, Pin-799001.

3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate,

Jirania Sub-Division, PS- Jirania, District-West Tripura, Tripura, Pin-

799045.

4. The Chief Executive Officer,

Ranirbazar Municipal Council, Ranirbazar, P.S. Ranirbazar, District - West Tripura, Tripura, Pin-799035

5. The Officer-in-Charge,

Ranirbazar Police Station, Ranirbazar, District West Tripura, Tripura., Pin-799035

………Respondents

6. Sri Prabir Das,

Vice-Chairman, Ranirbazar Municipal Council, Ranirbazar, PS- Ranirbazar, District – West Tripura, Tripura , Pin – 799035.

………..Proforma-Respondents

For the Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Indrajit Bhomik, Advocate.

For the Respondent(s)

:

Mr. P. Gautam, Sr. G.A.

HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

12.02.2026

Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.

Mr. Indrajit Bhowmik, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits before this Court that he wants to withdraw this present petition with liberty to approach before the appropriate forum.

Request considered.

Accordingly, this present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach before the competent Civil Court as well as the Criminal Court and also the competent authorities. Since, the same is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

As a sequel, miscellaneous application(s), pending if any, shall stand closed.

DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD, J

Paritosh

SABYASAC HI GHOSH Digitally signed by SABYASACHI GHOSH Date: 2026.02.18 17:18:25 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead