Tripura High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/66/2025 of Sri Haripada Ray Vs Sri Apurba Roy and Ors. on 5 February 2026
COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA Cont.Cas(C) No.66 of 2025 Sri Haripada Ray, S/o Lt. Manoranjan Ray, R/o: Ramnagar Road No.9, P.O.: Ramnagar, P.S.:West Tripura, District: West Tripura, PIN:799002, Aged about: 51 years. ---- Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Sri Apurba Roy, Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
Cont.Cas(C) No.66 of 2025
Sri Haripada Ray,
S/o Lt. Manoranjan Ray,
R/o: Ramnagar Road No.9,
P.O.: Ramnagar, P.S.:West Tripura,
District: West Tripura,
PIN:799002, Aged about: 51 years.
---- Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. Sri Apurba Roy, Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Tripura, P.O.: Secretariat, P.S.: New Capital Complex, Dist.: West Tripura, PIN: 799010.
2. Sri Akinchan Sarkar, Commissioner of Taxes, Govt. of Tripura, P.N. Complex, Gurkhabasti, P.O.: Kunjaban, P.S.: New Capital Complex, Dist: West Tripura, PIN: 799006.
3. Smt. Reena Debbarma, Under Secretary, Finance Department, P.O.: Secretariat, P.S.: New Capital Complex, Dist.: West Tripura, PIN: 799010.
----Respondent-Contemnor(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Arijit Bhaumik, Adv.
Ms. Ishpa Chakma, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Saktimoy Chakraborty, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Pinki Chakraborty, Adv.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
05/02/2026
Learned Counsel, Mr. Arijit Bhaumik is present on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned Senior Counsel, Mr. Saktimoy Chakraborty assisted by Learned Counsel, Ms. Pinki Chakraborty appeared on behalf of the respondents and submitted that by order dated 04.02.2026, the order of further extension of suspension of the petitioner has been revoked subject to the outcome of the writ appeal bearing WA No.110 of 2025.
Thus, it appears to this Court that nothing survives for further adjudication in this contempt petition.
Accordingly, the same stands disposed of. However, the petitioner shall have all the right to approach to the Court in due course of time, if he is so advised in accordance with law.
JUDGE
Snigdha SNIGDH A DAS Digitally signed by SNIGDHA DAS Date: 2026.02.06 16:27:24 +05'30'