Tripura High Court
Crl.Rev.P./44/2025 of Smt. Dipika Dey (Kar) Vs Sri Debajyoti Kar on 30 January 2026
COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA Crl. Rev. P. No. 44 of 2025 Smt. Dipika Dey (Kar) ---- Petitioner(s) Versus Sri Debajyoti Kar ----Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arjun Acharjee, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Agniva Chakraborty, Adv. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT Order 30.01.2026 Learned
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
Crl. Rev. P. No. 44 of 2025
Smt. Dipika Dey (Kar)
---- Petitioner(s)
Versus
Sri Debajyoti Kar
----Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Arjun Acharjee, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Agniva Chakraborty, Adv.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
30.01.2026
Learned counsel Mr. Arjun Acharjee, appears on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Agniva Chakraborty, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent.
The petitioner has challenged the order dated 02.04.2024 passed by learned Judge, Family Court in Crl. Misc. No.106/2022.
It appears from the order dated 02.04.2024 that by the said order the OP-husband was asked to pay for Rs.4,500/- per month to the petitioner from the month of March, 2024 and with further direction to pay the amount to the bank account of the petitioner wife. In the first part of the order it was also mentioned that as per affidavit the petitioner shall have the right to file petition for enhancement of maintenance allowance in future against the OP.
It is the settled position of law that for enhancement of maintenance allowance, it is always open for the petitioner to approach by filing petition to the competent Court in accordance with law.
It is not clear to this Court why the petitioner has filed this petition before this Court seeking reliefs. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for allowing him to withdraw the same and to file the petition before the competent Court. No liberty can be granted. However, it is the settled position of law that in case of variation of monthly income the petitioner can approach the competent Court. Accordingly, the present petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of, being not pressed by the petitioner. The case thus stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Satabdi SATABDI DUTTA Digitally signed by SATABDI DUTTA Date: 2026.02.03 16:12:52 +05'30'