Tripura High Court

WP(C)/10/2026 of Society for Tripura Medical College and Dr. BRAM Teaching Hospital Vs Canara Bank on 9 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) NO.10 OF 2026 Society of Tripura Medical College & DR. BRAM Teaching Hospital, Hapania, Agartala, West Tripura; represented by the Principal. ……. Petitioner Vs. Canara Bank, represented by the Chief Bank Manager of the North Banamalipur

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA

AGARTALA

WP(C) NO.10 OF 2026

Society of Tripura Medical College & DR. BRAM Teaching Hospital, Hapania, Agartala, West Tripura; represented by the Principal.

……. Petitioner

Vs.

Canara Bank, represented by the Chief Bank Manager of the North Banamalipur Branch, P.O. Agartala, P.S.-West Agartala, District- West Tripura, PIN-799001.

……. Respondent.

HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD

Present:

For the Petitioner (s)

: Mr. D. Bhattacharya, Sr. Advocate.

Mr. A. Chakraborty, Advocate.

For the Respondent(s) : None.

09.01.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

1. This present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-

“(i) ISSUE RULE calling upon the Respondent to show cause as to why a Writ of mandamus, directing the Respondent to forthwith release the Petitioner's funds amounting to INR 7 Crores along with pay interest from date of maturity until actual release at appropriate banking rates, which are being unlawfully withheld should not be issued;

(ii) After hearing the parties, be pleased to make the Rules absolute in terms of Prayer Nos. (i) above;

AND/OR

iii) Any other relief(s) as to this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and proper

2. It is seen from the record that petitioner has submitted several request(s)/representation(s) before the respondent dated 27th September, 2024, 7th November, 2024 and 12th, December, 2024. But the same remains unattended till date.

3. In view of the above facts, without going into the merits of the case, this present writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon the respondent to decide the matter in the light of the aforesaid request(s)/representation(s) made by the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of 2(two) months from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner herein.

4. With the above observations and directions, this present writ petition stands disposed of. As a sequel, stay if any stands vacated. Pending application(s), if any also stands closed.

DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD, J

Suhanjit SABYASAC HI GHOSH Digitally signed by SABYASACHI GHOSH Date: 2026.01.17 15:05:44 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead