Tripura High Court

Arb.P./14/2025 of Ramky Infrastructure Ltd., Vs The State of Tripura and Ors. on 9 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA _A_G_A_R_T_A_L_A_ Arb.P.No.14 of 2025 Arb.P.No.15 of 2025 Arb.P.No.16 of 2025 Arb.P.No.14 of 2025 Ramky Infrastructure Ltd., Ramky Grandiose, Ramky Towers Complex, Gachibowli, Hyderabad-500032 -----Petitioner(s) VS 1. The State of Tripura, represented by its Secretary,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA _A_G_A_R_T_A_L_A_

VS

3. The Chief Engineer, PWD(R&B), New Secretariat Complex, Agartala West Tripura

4. The Executive Engineer, Sonamura Division, PWD(R&B), P.O.-Sonamura, West Tripura

VS

3. The Chief Engineer, PWD(R&B), New Secretariat Complex, Agartala West Tripura

Sonamura Division, PWD(R&B), P.O.-Sonamura, West Tripura

VS

3. The Chief Engineer, PWD(Building), New Secretariat Complex, West Tripura, Agartala-799003

4. The Executive Engineer, Medical College Division PWD (R & B), Kunjaban, Shyamalibazar, Agartala, West Tripura, PIN-799001 -----Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Sujata Deb (Gupta), Advocate.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dipankar Sharma, Addl. G.A.

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO =O=R=D=E=R= 09/01/2026

This application has been filed by the applicant under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties arising out of the Memorandum of Understanding dt. 07.01.2009 in Arb.P.14 of 2025, Memorandum of Understanding dt. 07.01.2009 in Arb.P.15 of 2025 and Memorandum of Understanding dt. 30.07.2010 in Arb.P.16 of 2025.

Counsel appearing for the respondents states that he has no objection for appointment of an arbitrator to decide the dispute between the parties arising out of the work orders issued under said Memorandums of Understanding.

In view of the said submission, Justice G. Raghuram, Former Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court is appointed as an arbitrator to decide the disputes between the parties arising out of the work orders issued under said Memorandums of Understanding subject to the usual terms and conditions.

Learned Arbitrator is requested to take into consideration the Schedule of Model Fee prescribed under Schedule IV and the timeline prescribed under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended.

Registry is directed to communicate the instant order along with a copy of the entire pleadings of the instant application to the learned Arbitrator forthwith.

The instant petition is disposed of.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, CJ)

Sabyasachi B PULAK BANIK Digitally signed by PULAK BANIK Date: 2026.01.12 17:07:05 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead