Tripura High Court
WP(C)/300/2025 of Jayanta Chakraborty Vs The State of Tripura and 3 others on 12 December 2025
COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) No.300 of 2025 Jayanta Chakraborty, Son of Ashutosh Chakraborty, Resident of Uttar Madhya Para, Near Bishalgarh Road, Suryamaninagar, P.O. & P.S.:Amtali, District-West Tripura, Pin:799130, Age-55 years. ---- Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Tripura,
2
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
WP(C) No.300 of 2025
Jayanta Chakraborty,
Son of Ashutosh Chakraborty,
Resident of Uttar Madhya Para,
Near Bishalgarh Road, Suryamaninagar,
P.O. & P.S.:Amtali, District-West Tripura, Pin:799130, Age-55 years.
---- Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Tripura, represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Home Department, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Complex, Gurkhabasti, Agartala, P.O.-Kunjaban, P.S.-New Capital Complex, Sub- Division: Sadar, District: West Tripura.
2. The Director General of Police, Government of Tripura, Police Headquarters, Akhaura Road, Agartala, District:
West
Tripura,
Pin:799001.
3. The Principal Secretary, General Administration (Personnel &
Training) Department, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Complex, Gurkhabasti, Agartala, P.O.: Kunjaban, P.S.: New Capital Complex, Sub-Division: Sadar, District: West Tripura.
4. Tripura Public Service Commission (TPSC), represented by its Secretary, Akhaura Road, Agartala, District: West Tripura, Pin:799001.
----Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Purusuttam Roy Barman, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Sutapa Debbarman, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
None
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
12/12/2025
Learned Senior Counsel, Mr. Purusuttam Roy Barman assisted by Learned Counsel, Ms. Sutapa Debbarman is present on behalf of the petitioner.
None appeared for the respondents when the matter is taken up.
At this stage, Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition and as such, prayed to withdraw the same with a liberty to take proper recourse.
Request is considered.
Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with a liberty to take proper recourse, if he is so advised, in due course of time.
JUDGE
Snigdha SATABDI DUTTA Digitally signed by SATABDI DUTTA Date: 2025.12.12 16:53:03 +05'30'