Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/2615/2026 of AKASH KUMAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 25 August 2026

2026:UHC:7729

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2615/2026 Akash Kumar --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr. Navnish Negi,

UKHC010151862026

2026:UHC:7729

SL.

No.

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

WPMS/2615/2026

Akash Kumar

--Petitioner

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand

--Respondent

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. Navnish Negi, learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. Mr. S.K. Nailwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

Page 1 of 3

3. Petitioners have challenged notice dated 12.08.2026 issued to them under Section 4(1)(a) of Uttarakhand Road Infrastructure Protection Rules, 2023, whereby they have been asked to remove their encroachment from public road within three days, failing which the encroachment shall be removed at the costs and expenses of the petitioner.

4. Learned State Counsel submits that no demolition order has been passed against the petitioners as yet, hence, the writ petition is premature as petitioners have challenged the show cause notice. He submits that if petitioners have anything to say against the notice, it is open to them to submit reply before the Competent Authority.

5. This Court finds substance in the said submission. Since petitioners have challenged a show cause notice while

UKHC010151862026

2026:UHC:7729 they have opportunity to have their say before the Authority issuing such notice, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to give reply to the notice. If petitioners submit reply within a week, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, within three weeks thereafter. Petitioners shall enclose all documents, which support their claim regarding right, title or interest, if any, over the land in question. It shall also be open to the petitioners to raise all contention in their reply. For a period of four weeks or till decision is taken in the matter by the Competent Authority, whichever is earlier, status quo as on today shall be maintained.

Page 2 of 3

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)

25.08.2026 Aswal

NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.25 06:03:23 -07'00'

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead