Uttarakhand High Court

ABA/190/2026 of HIMANSHU SHARMA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 24 August 2026

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010091932026 ABA/190/2026 Himanshu Sharma --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Shariq Khurshid proxy

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

UKHC010091932026 ABA/190/2026

Himanshu Sharma --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Shariq Khurshid proxy counsel for Mr. Jasmeet Sahota, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. Rakesh Joshi, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Manoj Bhatt, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. Mr. Prince Chauhan, learned counsel for respondent no.2.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that he has no instructions from the applicant to proceed with the present anticipatory bail application.

5. In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, and there being no instructions to pursue the matter, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Alok Mahra, J.) 24-08-2026 Mamta

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead