Uttarakhand High Court

WPSB/549/2026 of DR ANSHUMAN MISHRA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 21 August 2026

2026:UHC:7558

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY Writ Petition (S/B) No.549 of 2026 Dr. Anshuman Mishra ----Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & Others ----Respondents August 21,

UKHC010148532026

2026:UHC:7558-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA

AND

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY

Writ Petition (S/B) No.549 of 2026

Dr. Anshuman Mishra

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand & Others ----Respondents August 21, 2026

----------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Rahul Verma, learned Additional Advocate General with Mr. B.P.S. Mer and Mr.

Sachin Mehta, learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondent no.1

Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Hemant Pant, learned counsel for respondent nos.3 and 4

Mr. Yogesh Pacholi, learned counsel for respondent no.5

Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, learned counsel for respondent no.6

JUDGMENT : (per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta, C. J.)

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner is an Assistant Professor in Chemical Engineering at Bipin Tripathi Kumaon Institute of Tehcnology, Dwarahat, District Almora. At the time of his entry in service, he was at Level-10. On 08.11.2016, he was placed at Level-11. The case of the petitioner is that as per AICTE Regulations, 2010 regarding Career Advancement Scheme, he became entitled to Level-12 upon completion of five years of service. It is also the case of the petitioner that even as per AICTE Regulations, 2019, he is entitled to Level-12 after four years as he fulfills the other

Page 1 of 2

UKHC010148532026

2026:UHC:7558-DB

academic requirements stipulated in 2019 Regulations. However, the Institute has been deliberately delaying the process of grant of Level-12.

3. Shri Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not pressing prayer nos.1 to 4. He submits that respondents be directed to conclude the process for promotion to Level-12 and Level-13 within a specified time frame.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents do not oppose the said prayer and state that the process would be completed in accordance with law within such time as may be directed by this Court.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent Institute to conclude the process of promotion to Level-12 and Level-13 as per Career Advancement Scheme in accordance with law within three months from today.

(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.)

(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 21.08.2026 Rajni

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead