Uttarakhand High Court

AO/244/2014 of FARMOOD Vs ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED on 20 August 2026

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010015242014 AO/244/2014 Farmood and Another --Appellants Versus Oriental Insurance Company Limited And Others --Respondents Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

UKHC010015242014 AO/244/2014

Farmood and Another --Appellants Versus Oriental Insurance Company Limited And Others --Respondents

Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia and Mr. Kishore Rai, Advocates for the appellant.

2. Mr. Deepak Rawat and Mr. Deepak Bisht, Advocates for the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents has not seriously objected to the Delay Condonation Application. As such, the Delay Condonation Application (CLMA No. 6123 of 2014) is allowed. The delay is hereby condoned.

4. The present appeal from order has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and order dated 17.10.2013 passed by MACT/District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar (Rudrapur), in MACP Case No. 80 of 2010.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the learned MACT concerned has not taken into consideration the averments made by him in the written statement and have passed the award in an arbitrary and cursory manner.

6. Per contra, learned counsel for the

Page 1 of 2

respondents/Insurance Company have submitted that the award passed by MACT concerned is proper and just.

7. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

8. As such, the Tribunal concerned in the opinion of this Court have rightly came to the conclusion that the respondent nos. 1 and 2 in the claim petition have nowhere stated that the present revisionist is their employee, therefore, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order dated 17.10.2013 passed by MACT/District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar (Rudrapur), in MACP Case No. 80 of 2010.

9. Accordingly, the present Appeal from Order is liable to be dismissed and the same is hereby dismissed.

(Alok Mahra J.)

20.08.2026 Ujjwal

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead