Uttarakhand High Court
C528/1718/2026 of ANURAG PAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 20 August 2026
2026:UHC:7523
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/1718/2026 Anurag Pal --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Mukesh Singh Rawat,
UKHC010137802026
2026:UHC:7523
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
C528/1718/2026
Anurag Pal
--Applicant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Mukesh Singh Rawat, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. By the instant petition, the present applicant is challenging the proceeding on the ground that the injuries are not so fatal which constitutes an offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. Apart from this, he submits that no specific role has been assigned to the present applicant and it is completely an abuse of process of law.
4. On the other side, Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State at this juncture submits that in the petition preferred under Section 528 of BNS 2023, appreciation of evidence can be looked until and unless the case which falls under seven categories of cases as categorized by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and others, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 which still holds good law.
5. After gone through with the records I do not find any good ground to entertain this petition.
6. Accordingly, the instant C528 petition is dismissed.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
20-08-2026 Parul
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…