Uttarakhand High Court
WPPIL/103/2026 of MANJEET SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 20 August 2026
2026:UHC:7502
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY Writ Petition (PIL) No.103 of 2026 20th August, 2026 Manjeet Singh -----Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others ----Respondents
UKHC010148432026
2026:UHC:7502-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY
Writ Petition (PIL) No.103 of 2026
20th August, 2026
Manjeet Singh
-----Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others
----Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Yogesh Pant and Ms. Harshi Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Amarendra Pratap Singh, learned Addl. Advocate General and Mr.
B.S. Parihar, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand/
respondent nos.1 to 4.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT : (per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta C. J.)
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present public interest litigation has been filed with the grievance that private respondent nos.5 to 8 have encroached over the nala existing over Khasra No.229, Village Jangal Jogidher, Pargana Billhairi Tehsil Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar.
3. Accordingly, prayer has been made for issuing direction to the respondents to take action against the illegal encroachments within a specified time frame.
4. Learned State Counsel has placed on record the instructions received from Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Page 1 of 2
UKHC010148432026
2026:UHC:7502-DB Khatima and wherein the fact relating to existence of nala over Khasra No.229 has been admitted.
5. Learned State Counsel states that the official respondents have already issued notices to the private respondents for removal of encroachments. He states that the proceedings in pursuance of the said notices would be concluded expeditiously.
6. In view of the aforesaid stand, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Khatima, Udham Singh Nagar (respondent no.3) to conclude the proceedings stated to have been initiated against the private respondents expeditiously in accordance with law.
7. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 20.08.2026 SS
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…