Uttarakhand High Court

ABA/239/2026 of IMTIYAZ Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 20 August 2026

2026:UHC:7529

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/239/2026 Imtiyaz --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent With ABA/231/2026 Adil --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand

UKHC010107992026

2026:UHC:7529 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

ABA/239/2026 Imtiyaz --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent With ABA/231/2026 Adil --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant.

Mr. Prabhat Kandpal and Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

Page 1 of 3

Mr. Amit Tyagi, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Neeraj Garg, learned counsel for the complainant.

2. By means of the present applications, the applicants, namely, Imtiyaz and Adil, seek grant of anticipatory bail in connection with FIR dated 04.12.2025, being FIR No. 0667 of 2025, registered at Police Station Patel Nagar, District Dehradun, for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(2), 338, 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants do not wish to press the present Anticipatory Bail Applications and seeks permission to withdraw the same, with UKHC010107992026

Page 2 of 3

2026:UHC:7529 liberty to surrender before the competent court and seek regular bail. He further prays that the applicants may be granted three weeks' time to surrender and that, in case they surrender and file their bail applications, the same may be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible, without being influenced by the fact that the present Anticipatory Bail Applications have been withdrawn.

5. Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants.

6. The prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants is innocuous and deserves to be accepted.

7. Accordingly, the applicants are permitted to surrender before the competent court on or before 15.09.2026 and, in case they surrender and file their bail applications, the same shall be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible, without unnecessary delay, in accordance with law.

8. It is further clarified that the bail applications of the applicants shall be considered and decided on their own merits and shall not be influenced by the fact that the present Anticipatory Bail Applications have been withdrawn.

9. In view of the above observations, the present Anticipatory Bail Applications are disposed of as withdrawn.

(Alok Mahra, J.) 20-08-2026 SB

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead