Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/1602/2020 of SMT. KISHANLATA Vs BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED on 19 August 2026

2026:UHC:7494

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/1602/2020 Smt. Kishanlata --Petitioner Versus Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

UKHC010090722020

2026:UHC:7494 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

WPMS/1602/2020

Smt. Kishanlata --Petitioner Versus Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited --Respondent

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Nitin Kamal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Himanshu Pal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Shailendra Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the respondent.

2. Mr. Nitin Kamal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Himanshu Pal, Advocate appearing for the petitioner makes statement at the bar that writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.

3. In view of the statement so made, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 19.08.2026 Mahinder

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead