Uttarakhand High Court
C528/1831/2026 of SANJAY NEGI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 19 August 2026
2026:UHC:7462
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/1831/2026 Sanjay Negi --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for the
UKHC010147482026
2026:UHC:7462
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
C528/1831/2026
Sanjay Negi
--Applicant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, learned AGA for the State.
3. Mr. Harshit Bisht, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2.
4. The instant petition is moved under Section 528 of BNS, 2023 by the present applicant, who is facing trial for offences punishable under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC in Complaint Case No. 211 of 2024 (Smt. Sujata Rawat Vs. Sanjay Negi) pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate – I Class, Kashipur, District – Udham Singh Nagar.
5. The instant petition has been moved along with compounding application with the affidavit of the applicant and respondent no. 2.
6. Applicant and respondent no. 2 are present in the Court and they are duly identified by their respective counsel.
7. It is contended in the compounding application that applicant married with respondent no. 2 in the year 2022 and from this marriage there is one child and due to some misunderstanding, the instant complaint has been filed and now, both of them have settled their dispute amicably and are living happily with their child. It is further contended that since they have resolved their dispute amicably, therefore, instant criminal proceedings be quashed.
8. On the other side, learned State Counsel submits that dispute in between the parties UKHC010147482026 2026:UHC:7462 appears to be matrimonial one and now, since parties have settled their dispute amicably and living happily and the informant herself does not want pursue the trial, therefore, there is no useful purpose to continue with the trial.
9. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that both the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and are now living happily, therefore, this Court is of the view that there is no useful purpose to continue with the trial. Accordingly, compounding application i.e I.A. No. 1 of 2026 as well as instant C528 petition are allowed.
10. Consequently, entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 211 of 2024 (Smt. Sujata Rawat Vs. Sanjay Negi) pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate – I Class, Kashipur, District – Udham Singh Nagar is hereby quashed. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 19.08.2026 SKS
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…