Uttarakhand High Court

CRLR/62/2019 of SATYA PAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 19 August 2026

2026:UHC:7489

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR/62/2019 Satya Pal --Revisionist Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Neetu Singh (through video

UKHC010018602019

2026:UHC:7489 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

CRLR/62/2019 Satya Pal --Revisionist Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Ms. Neetu Singh (through video conferencing) assisted by Mr. Vinod Joshi and Ms. Komal Kandpal, learned counsel for the revisionist.

Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.

Mr. R.P. Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 2.

2. The present Criminal Revision has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 25.04.2017, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Roorkee, District Haridwar in Criminal Complaint Case No. 717 of 2016, whereby the revisionist has been convicted under Section

Page 1 of 3

of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of ₹2,40,000/-, out of which ₹2,30,000/- was directed to be paid to the respondent and ₹10,000/- was directed to be deposited in the State Treasury. In default of payment of fine, the revisionist was further directed to undergo three months' imprisonment. The revisionist has also challenged the judgment and order dated 14.11.2018, passed by learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Haridwar in Criminal Appeal No. 87 of 2017, whereby the appeal preferred by the revisionist against the judgment and order dated 25.04.2017 has been UKHC010018602019

2026:UHC:7489 dismissed.

Page 2 of 3

Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist has handed over a Demand Draft dated 07.08.2026, drawn on Bank of Baroda, Malviya Chowk, Roorkee, District Haridwar, amounting to ₹80,000/-, in favour of the respondent. She further submits that the revisionist shall pay the remaining amount of ₹1,50,000/- to the respondent within a period of four months from today.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the aforesaid proposal.

5. In view of the aforesaid settlement between the parties and the undertaking given on behalf of the revisionist, the present Criminal Revision is disposed of with a direction that the revisionist shall pay the remaining amount of ₹1,50,000/- to the respondent within a period of four months from today.

6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.

(Alok Mahra, J.) 19-08-2026 SB

SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b09c12f218 22fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9BED00E67 B5283D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.08.19 18:38:43 +05'30'

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead