Uttarakhand High Court

CLCON/17/2026 of PREM SINGH Vs RANJAN KUMAR MISHRA on 18 August 2026

2026:UHC:7421

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CLCON/17/2026 Prem Singh --Petitioner Versus Ranjan Kumar Mishra --Respondent With CLCON/18/2026 Chandan Singh Tanganiya --Petitioner

UKHC010008442026

2026:UHC:7421 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

CLCON/17/2026 Prem Singh --Petitioner Versus Ranjan Kumar Mishra --Respondent With CLCON/18/2026 Chandan Singh Tanganiya --Petitioner Versus Ranjan Kumar Mishra --Respondent CLCON/19/2026 Hari Prakash --Petitioner Versus Ranjan Kumar Mishra --Respondent CLCON/20/2026 Manoj Kumar Kandpal --Petitioner Versus Ranjan Kumar Mishra --Respondent Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Page 1 of 2

Mr. Alok Dalakoti, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) appeared through V.C.

2. Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, learned Brief Holder for the State/contemnor.

3. On instructions, learned counsel for the respondent-contemnors submits that order of the Writ Court dated 17.12.2024 has been complied with by deciding the representation submitted by the petitioner. The representation has been rejected by the respondent-contemnor and, according to him, these contempt petitions have rendered infructuous.

UKHC010008442026

2026:UHC:7421 He supplied the order dated 30.10.2025/06.06.2026 passed in all the writ petitions, which is taken on record, a copy of which has also been served upon the petitioner(s) in all these contempt petitions.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent/contemnor submits that in all cases, similar orders have been passed, though by different authorities, but the crux of the matter is that the order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with.

5. In such view of the matter, all contempt petitions are hereby closed. Petitioner(s) is at liberty to challenge the order passed by the respondent- contemnor, by which the representation was rejected, by filing fresh writ petition(s).

(Pankaj Purohit, J.)

18.08.2026 AK

AVNEE T KAUR Digitally signed by AVNEET KAUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=a82175252dc1a0f53f0e245a1c11df9aa490cfd1 403838bf52f9acab4cc3a5b9, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=5BEC18DADE54688668187E4D722C2ED BFDAF35AB2F676A551481BE62508FDDEE, cn=AVNEET KAUR Date: 2026.08.19 16:49:59 +05'30'

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead