Uttarakhand High Court

WPCRL/1662/2026 of SABNOOR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 18 August 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010146382026 WPCRL/1662/2026 Sabnoor and Another --Petitioners Versus State Of Uttarakhand and Others --Respondents Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

UKHC010146382026 WPCRL/1662/2026

Sabnoor and Another --Petitioners Versus State Of Uttarakhand and Others --Respondents

Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, A.G.A. for the State.

3. Petitioners have approached this Court seeking the following reliefs: “(i) Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent no.2 to provide protection to the petitioners from the respondent no. 4.”

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are major and they belong to the same faith. It is further submitted that the petitioners developed a liking for each other, which has ended in love and they have solemnized their Nikah on 06.08.2026, at Village Landhora, District Haridwar.

5. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that respondent no. 4, who is elder sister of petitioner no. 1, is not happy with this marriage and thus she is threatening the petitioners of dire

consequences.

6. Petitioners submit that they are facing stiff resistance, and they seriously apprehend threat to their life and limb from their family members, and hence they are before this Court praying for protection.

7. Both the petitioners are present before this Court and they have submitted that they will soon register their marriage under Rules 7(1)(g) of U.C.C.

8. In that view of the matter, and in view of the ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs State of U.P. and another, (2006) 5 SCC 475, the petitioners have made out a case for grant of protection.

9. The Station House Officer, Police Station Manglaur, District Haridwar is directed to assess the threat, if any, to the life and limb of the petitioners, and provide necessary protection, if it is found that there is a threat to the life and limb of the petitioners. The S.H.O. concerned is further directed to summon the private respondents, and such other persons, who are inimically placed towards the marriage of the petitioners, and counsel them, in accordance with law.

10. The writ petition stands ordered accordingly.

(Alok Mahra J.)

18.08.2026 Ujjwal

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead