Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/824/2023 of SMT NEELAM Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ, U.K. DEHRADUN on 18 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/824/2023 Smt Neelam --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand Through Secretary, Panchayat Raj, U.k. Dehradun --Respondent

UKHC010041732023

2026:UHC:7427

SL.

No.

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

WPMS/824/2023

Smt Neelam

--Petitioner

Versus

State

Of

Uttarakhand

Through

Secretary,

Panchayat

Raj,

U.k.

Dehradun

--Respondent

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. B.S. Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-

(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 1.3.2023 passed by respondent no. 4 (Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition).

(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned scrutiny report dated 23.1.2023 issued by scrutiny committee (Annexure No. 5 to this writ petition).

4. Permanent resident certificate of the petitioner was cancelled on the recommendation of District Level Caste Scrutiny Committee. The order, whereby his permanent resident certificate was cancelled, has been challenged in this writ petition.

5. Learned State Counsel has

UKHC010041732023

2026:UHC:7427 produced in Court Government Order dated 31.10.2023 issued by Secretary, Social Welfare Department. Clause 8 of the said order provides that against the decision taken by District Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, appeal shall lie before the State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee.

6. Since petitioner has remedy of appeal before State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to approach the State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee. If petitioner files appeal within three weeks, State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee shall take decision thereupon, as per law, within six months after hearing all the stakeholders.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)

18.08.2026 Aswal

NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512e a30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE5 8A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.18 04:55:18 -07'00'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead