Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/1312/2026 of CHANDRA TAYAL AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 18 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/1312/2026 Chandra Tayal And Others --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Amar
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010119762026
2026:UHC:7431 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL/1312/2026
Chandra Tayal And Others --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Amar Murti Shukla and Mr. Rohit Kumar Gaur, Advocates for the petitioners.
Mr. Deepak Bisht, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. J.P. Kandpal, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
2. Petitioners have approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:
“I. Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.2, 3 and 4 forthwith to restore peaceful and physical possession of the property to the petitioners from illegal seizure at the hands of the police personnels without there has been any authority under the law.
II. Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.2, 3 and 4 to give the physical possession of the property to the petitioners by removing the illegal seizure.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, during the pendency of the present writ petition, the keys of the gate, which had been locked and were in the custody of the police authorities, have been handed over to the petitioners.
UKHC010119762026
2026:UHC:7431
4. The aforesaid submission is duly corroborated by the written instructions furnished by learned State Counsel, which are taken on record.
5. In view of the aforesaid development, the grievance raised by the petitioners in the present writ petition does not survive for consideration at this stage. However, it is expected that respondent nos. 3 and 4 shall ensure that the petitioners are not subjected to any unnecessary harassment or victimization.
6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Alok Mahra, J.)
18.08.2026 Arpan
ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a20d ddb7393398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109CB98 7446351E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2026.08.18 17:51:45 +05'30'