Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/2436/2026 of PARAMJEET SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 18 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2436/2026 Paramjeet Singh --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr. T.A.

UKHC010141722026

2026:UHC:7399

SL.

No.

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

WPMS/2436/2026

Paramjeet Singh

--Petitioner

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand

--Respondent

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. T.A. Khan, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief:-

(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents no. 1 to 5 to conduct a high level enquiry with regard to the changing of name of the respondent no. 6 in place of "Harjinder Singh" as "Harjinder Singh urf Joginder Singh" and the name of the respondent no. 7 in place of "Lakhvinder Singh" as "Lakhvinder Singh urf Lakkha Singh", as manipulated in Parivar Register of Gram Panchayat Dheemarkheda, Vikas Khand- Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar (Annexure no. 3, page 25:3 to the writ petition).

(ii) II-To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the of pariwar register, issued by the respondent no. 5, (Annexure No. 3, Page 25 to 30).

4. From the pleadings made in the writ petition, it is revealed that there is a civil litigation going on between petitioner UKHC010141722026

2026:UHC:7399 and the persons, named in prayer no. 1, and petitioner wants to settle the score with them by having a High Level Enquiry instituted against them which will also give petitioner an edge in the ongoing litigation.

5. This Court is not inclined to grant the relief as prayed by the petitioner. The writ petition is, however, disposed of with liberty to petitioner to approach the Competent Authority.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)

18.08.2026 Aswal

NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3 a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22 DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.18 07:31:09 -07'00'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead