Uttarakhand High Court
C528/1799/2026 of ANIL KUMAR Vs JAVED QURESHI on 18 August 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/1799/2026 Anil Kumar --Applicant Versus Javed Qureshi --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. B.S. Koranga, learned counsel for the
UKHC010143982026
2026:UHC:7403
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
C528/1799/2026
Anil Kumar
--Applicant
Versus
Javed Qureshi
--Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. B.S. Koranga, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, learned AGA for the State.
3. The instant petition is moved under Section 528 of BNS, 2023 by Anil Kumar, son of Prem Lal Nautiyal, for expediting the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 3678 of 2019 (State Vs. Javed Qureshi), arising out of FIR dated 11.05.2019 bearing FIR No. 128 of 2019 wherein respondent no. 2 has been implicated for the offences punishable under Section 406, 420 IPC, registered at Police Station – Nehru Colony, District Dehradun, pending in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun.
4. Applicant lodged an FIR dated 11.05.2016 bearing FIR No. 128 of 2019 against the respondent no. 2 for the offences punishable under Section 406, 420 IPC and after investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the respondent no. 2 for the offences punishable under Section 406, 420 IPC. Thereafter, respondent no. 2 moved a bail application bearing Bail Application No. 1346 of 2019 before this Court and on 17.10.2019, the bail application was listed and respondent no. 2 made a statement before this Court that he is ready to pay 50% of the amount but till date he has not paid any single penny. Respondent no. 2 is adopting delaying tactics to delay the trial and the trial is being regularly adjourned on one pretext or another and there is no substantial progress in the UKHC010143982026 2026:UHC:7403 trial.
5. In such view of the matter, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to the trial court to expedite the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 3678 of 2019 (State Vs. Javed Qureshi) pending in the court of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 18.08.2026 SKS