Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/2203/2026 of AMAR SHARMA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 17 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/2203/2026 Amar Sharma --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr. Chandra
UKHC010145492026
2026:UHC:7380
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS/2203/2026
Amar Sharma
--Petitioner
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. R.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Narayan Dutt, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Mr. Rajesh Sharma, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3.
4. Petitioner was engaged through outsourcing in Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation for discharging duties as a Group ‘D’ employees on 12.10.2023 and he served in that capacity till 29.02.2024. The outsourcing agency thereafter sponsored some other person in place of petitioner for discharging duties as Group ‘D’ employees.
5. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-
(i) Issue a writ order or directions to the respondents in the nature of the mandamus for direct the respondents to restate to the petitioner as out source employee as karmkar and given the sufficient opportunity of hearing UKHC010145492026
2026:UHC:7380 and release the due amount of the petitioner.
(ii) Issue a writ order or directions to the respondents in the nature of the certiorari for quash and set-aside the joining letter/order dated 29.02.2024 of the respondent no. 5 (Annexure no. 2 page no. 12).
6. Mr. Rajesh Sharma, learned counsel appearing for Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation submits that if petitioner has any grievance, then he can make representation to the Divisional Logging Manager concerned.
7. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by permitting petitioner to make representation. If petitioner makes representation to the Divisional Logging Manager concerned, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, within six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. It shall be open to the petitioner to stake claim for unpaid wages, in his representation.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
17.08.2026 Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a0 8b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DA CF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.18 07:57:43 -07'00'