Uttarakhand High Court

WPSS/2203/2026 of AMAR SHARMA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 17 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/2203/2026 Amar Sharma --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr. Chandra

UKHC010145492026

2026:UHC:7380

SL.

No.

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

WPSS/2203/2026

Amar Sharma

--Petitioner

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand

--Respondent

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. R.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Narayan Dutt, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Rajesh Sharma, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3.

4. Petitioner was engaged through outsourcing in Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation for discharging duties as a Group ‘D’ employees on 12.10.2023 and he served in that capacity till 29.02.2024. The outsourcing agency thereafter sponsored some other person in place of petitioner for discharging duties as Group ‘D’ employees.

5. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ order or directions to the respondents in the nature of the mandamus for direct the respondents to restate to the petitioner as out source employee as karmkar and given the sufficient opportunity of hearing UKHC010145492026

2026:UHC:7380 and release the due amount of the petitioner.

(ii) Issue a writ order or directions to the respondents in the nature of the certiorari for quash and set-aside the joining letter/order dated 29.02.2024 of the respondent no. 5 (Annexure no. 2 page no. 12).

6. Mr. Rajesh Sharma, learned counsel appearing for Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation submits that if petitioner has any grievance, then he can make representation to the Divisional Logging Manager concerned.

7. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by permitting petitioner to make representation. If petitioner makes representation to the Divisional Logging Manager concerned, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, within six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. It shall be open to the petitioner to stake claim for unpaid wages, in his representation.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)

17.08.2026 Aswal

NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a0 8b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DA CF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.18 07:57:43 -07'00'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead