Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2419/2026 of DEVENDRA PRASAD BAGWARI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 17 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2419/2026 Devendra Prasad Bagwari --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr.
UKHC010140262026
2026:UHC:7338
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2419/2026
Devendra Prasad Bagwari
--Petitioner
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Mridul Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Yogesh Pande, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.
3.
Prayer
for amendment is not opposed by learned State Counsel.
4. In the interest of justice, amendment application (IA No. 2 of 2026) is allowed.
5. Amended memo of parties be filed during the course of the day. Copy of this order shall be issued only when amendment is incorporated in the writ petition.
6. According to petitioner, he has made representation regarding handing over physical possession of the house which was allotted to him by the Authorities. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to the Competent Authority to take decision on the representation.
UKHC010140262026
2026:UHC:7338
7. Since petitioner has already made a representation on 02.011.2025, which is on record as annexure 1 to the writ petition, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to District Magistrate, Rudraprayag to take decision on petitioner’s representation, as per law, within ten weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. It goes without saying that the person, likely to be affected by the decision to be taken, shall also be given opportunity of hearing before passing any order.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
17.08.2026 Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.17 06:06:28 -07'00'