Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/3164/2016 of VIRENDRA KUMAR Vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION /ADM NAZUL on 17 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/3164/2016 Virendra Kumar --Petitioner Versus Deputy Director Of Consolidation /adm Nazul --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010027302016
2026:UHC:7371 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/3164/2016
Virendra Kumar --Petitioner Versus Deputy Director Of Consolidation /adm Nazul --Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. K.R. Gazi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
2. Mr. Khalid Rehman Gazi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that civil litigation pending between the parties has been decided based on a compromise. He thus submits that the writ petition has now become infructuous in view of subsequent developments.
3. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent also supports the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 17.08.2026 Mahinder