Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2494/2026 of MANOJ KUMAR KAMBOJ Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 17 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2494/2026 Manoj Kumar Kamboj --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr. Rishab
UKHC010145072026
2026:UHC:7340
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2494/2026
Manoj Kumar Kamboj
--Petitioner
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Rishab Ranghar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, learned counsel for the respondent-Gram Sabha.
4. Petitioner has challenged a notice issued by Tehsildar, Doiwala (Dehradun) to petitioner on 11.08.2026. By the said notice petitioner was asked to remove his encroachment from Gram Sabha land.
5. It is contended on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has not made any encroachment over Gram Sabha land and he purchased 80 Sq. Meter land by registered sale deed dated 21.03.2024.
6. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Gram Sabha, however, submits that petitioner has raised boundary wall only recently and while raising such construction, petitioner has encroached upon adjoining Gram Sabha land.
UKHC010145072026
2026:UHC:7340
7. Since petitioner was simply asked to vacate the Gram Sabha land, therefore, petitioner is at liberty to have his say before Tehsildar concerned.
8. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to petitioner to give reply to the notice. Along with his reply petitioner shall enclose all relevant documents which support his contention that he has not made any encroachment over Gram Sabha / Government Land. If petitioner makes such representation within one week from today, decision thereupon shall be taken by Tehsildar, as per law, within four weeks thereafter. For a period of six weeks or till decision is taken by Tehsildar concerned, whichever is earlier, status quo, as regards boundary wall of the petitioner, shall be maintained.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
17.08.2026 Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A5853172 6FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.17 06:12:19 -07'00'