Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/908/2024 of YOGESH SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 17 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/908/2024 Yogesh Singh --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. None present for
UKHC010050312024
2026:UHC:7344
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/908/2024
Yogesh Singh
--Petitioner
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None present for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for the respondent-Commission.
4. Petitioner participated in a selection for appointment to the post of Sanitary Inspector held by Uttarakhand Public Service Commission, pursuant to advertisement dated 08.08.2023. According to petitioner, he qualified in the mains examination and he was called upon to produce educational certificates in original.
5. Since petitioner could not produce the educational certificates, in original, on or before the deadline fixed for that purpose i.e. 29.12.2023, therefore, his candidature was rejected by the Commission. Petitioner thereafter made a representation, which too was rejected by Secretary, Uttarakhand Public Service Commission vide order dated 28.03.2024.
UKHC010050312024
2026:UHC:7344
6. This Court do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order, as petitioner himself is to be blamed for not furnishing the required documents within stipulated time.
7. Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel appearing for the Commission submits that the selection process was concluded way back in 2024 and names of selected candidates were recommended to the State Government, vide letter dated 08.10.2024. He submits that all the selected candidates have now been appointed and now they are serving as Sanitary Inspector.
8. This Court do not find any reason to interfere in the matter at this belated stage. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and is dismissed.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
17.08.2026 Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b0 8d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4 F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.17 06:08:40 -07'00'