Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2454/2026 of ARJUN CHAND Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 17 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2454/2026 Arjun Chand --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Ms. Geetanjali
UKHC010142672026
2026:UHC:7339
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2454/2026
Arjun Chand
--Petitioner
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Ms. Geetanjali Dhami, learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Mr. K.S. Mehta, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. According to petitioners, they are in unauthorised occupation over Government land which is recorded as Category-IV in the revenue records. Petitioners have sought a direction to the Competent Authority to take decision on their application for regularisation of their possession over such Government Land.
4. The period for which petitioners are in unauthorised occupation over such land, however, is not indicated in the writ petition. Reliance is placed upon Government Order dated 15.07.2016, which permits regularisation of possession over Category-IV land.
5. Learned State Counsel, however, submits that petitioners are not eligible for benefit of Government Policy, as they do not meet the eligibility conditions mentioned in the Government Order.
UKHC010142672026
2026:UHC:7339
6. Be that as it may, since petitioners have applied for regularisation and reportedly they have also deposited certain amount as per policy with the authorities, therefore, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Competent Authority to examine petitioner’s claim for regularisation and pass appropriate order, as per law, one way or the other, within six months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
17.08.2026 Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08 d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F 4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.17 06:05:10 -07'00'