Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/2207/2026 of PRATAP SINGH BISHT Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 17 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/2207/2026 Pratap Singh Bisht --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Bhupendra
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010145542026
2026:UHC:7365 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS/2207/2026
Pratap Singh Bisht --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Bhupendra Singh Bora, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Sushil Vashistha, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent no. 1.
3. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 3.
4. Petitioner is serving against a Group-D post in Nagar Palika Parishad, Tehri reportedly since 2006. According to him, he is entitled to be considered for promotion against Group-C post in 30% quota available to Group-D employees. His claim for promotion is rejected by Executive Officer vide order dated 27.06.2026, on the ground that against four sanctioned posts of Junior Clerk, there are as many as seven Junior Clerks serving in Nagar Palika Parishad.
5. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that against four vacancies, seven persons cannot be regularly appointed; it appears that persons serving as Junior Clerk are appointed on contract through outsourcing agency or UKHC010145542026
2026:UHC:7365 on ad hoc basis, as no one can be regularly appointed without there being sanctioned vacant post.
6. This Court finds substance in the submission made by Mr. Bhupendra Singh Bora, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. It is incumbent upon the Executive Officer to ascertain how many, out of aforesaid seven persons are substantively appointed as Junior Clerk.
7. Since there are four sanctioned posts of Junior Clerk and as per the applicable rules, Group-D employees are entitled to be considered for promotion within the quota meant for them therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Executive Officer concerned to determine the share of Group-D employees in the promotion quota and to consider petitioner’s claim for promotion, as per his seniority, against such post. Needful be done within eight weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 17.08.2026 Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131 bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D65 3D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.08.18 10:25:55 +05'30'