Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/2170/2026 of JAYAD SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 17 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/2170/2026 Jayad Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010142962026
2026:UHC:7352 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS/2170/2026
Jayad Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Harendra Belwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
2. Petitioner retired from the post of Mate from Public Works Department on 31.03.2024. All his retiral dues were released in his favour including pension. In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged order dated 31.03.2025, passed by Chief Treasury Officer, Champawat, which provides for recovery of Rs. 3,64,758/- from the petitioner.
3. Petitioner contends that he has not practiced fraud upon the authority and whatever amount was released to him after retirement, was as per the calculation made by departmental authorities. Thus it is UKHC010142962026
2026:UHC:7352 contended that in view of the law declared by Hon’ble Supreme Court, after retirement, recovery is not permissible from the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has made representation to the competent authority on 28.04.2026, who may be directed to take decision.
5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with direction to respondent No. 3 to take decision on the representation dated 28.04.2026 made by petitioner, as per law, within four months from date of presentation of certified copy of this order.
6. In case representation made by petitioner is allowed, then the amount already recovered from him, shall be refunded to him.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 17.08.2026 Mahinder