Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/2537/2025 of M/S PRIME INDUSTRIES Vs STATE INFRASTRUCTURE AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION on 17 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010132352025 WPMS/2537/2025 M/s Prime Industries --Petitioner Versus State Infrastructure And Industrial Development Corporation --Respondent

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

UKHC010132352025 WPMS/2537/2025

M/s Prime Industries --Petitioner Versus State Infrastructure And Industrial Development Corporation --Respondent

Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Eshan Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner.

2. There is no representation for the respondent.

3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- “I) Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of certiorari allowing the present butto petition in favor of the petitioner and against the respondent, while setting aside the impugned order of cancellation dated 15.07.2023 passed by the respondent (annexed at Annexure no. 15), being illegal, arbitrary and unlawful, and/or, II) Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of certiorari while setting aside the impugned order for cancellation dated 12.08.2025 (annexed at Annexure no. 26) and 19.08.2025 (annexed at Annexure no. 27), and/or: III), Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus while directing the respondent to cease in taking the physical possession of the plot/unit leased in favor of the petitioner vide lease deed dated 30.11.2005, and/or: IV) Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus and direct the respondent to open the online platform of the petitioner on the respondent website, such that the petitioner could be able to continue the necessary payments like lease rent, etc., and/or.”

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has made a representation to the Managing Director, SIIDCUL on

12.08.2025, who may be directed to take decision thereupon.

5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the Managing Director, SIIDCUL to take decision on the pending representation of the petitioner, as per law, within eight weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 17.08.2026 Navin

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead