Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2381/2026 of NEERU KANSAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 14 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2381/2026 Neeru Kansal --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Yogesh
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010137982026
2026:UHC:7256 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2381/2026
Neeru Kansal --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Yogesh Pant and Ms. Archita Badoni, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Ms. Mamta Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. According to petitioner, she deposited rupees twenty lacs with Tehsildar, Sitarganj, in compliance of order passed by Additional District Magistrate, on 03.09.2024 and 03.10.2024 and that amount deserves to be refunded to her in view of judgment rendered by Board of Revenue in Revision No. 11/2023-24.
4. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief:-
“I. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release/return of Rs.20,00,000/- (Twenty Lakh Rupees) deposited by the petitioner before the Tehsildar, Tehsil Sitarganj in pursuant to the recovery proceeding initiated against the petitioner based on the order passed by the Add. District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue) District Udham Singh Nagar in Stamp Case no. 52/13 of 2013-14.”
UKHC010137982026
2026:UHC:7256
5. Ms. Mamta Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the respondents submits that if petitioner makes representation to District Magistrate concerned within two weeks from today, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, within six weeks thereafter.
6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of statement made by Ms. Mamta Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 14.08.2026 Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a1 31bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56 D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.08.14 19:29:53 +05'30'