Uttarakhand High Court

WPCRL/1573/2026 of BABU HUSSAIN Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 14 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/1573/2026 Babu Hussain --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Mohit Kumar Kashyap,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

UKHC010139752026

2026:UHC:7243 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

WPCRL/1573/2026 Babu Hussain --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Mohit Kumar Kashyap, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned A.G.A. assisted by Mr. Nikhil Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

2. The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent authorities not to create any hindrance in the peaceful life of the petitioner and further directing respondent no. 3 not to harass or victimize the petitioner and his family members without any fault on their part.

3. On the previous occasion, learned State Counsel sought time to obtain instructions in the matter.

4. Today, learned A.G.A., on the basis of written instructions received from the concerned police authorities, submits that the petitioner had lodged a missing report regarding his son at Police Station Suar, State of Uttar Pradesh. During the course of inquiry, it was found that the petitioner's son, namely Jishan, is presently residing at Un, District Khargone, State of Madhya Pradesh. It is further submitted that the police authorities facilitated a telephonic conversation between the petitioner and his son. Thereafter, the petitioner moved an application before Police Station Kelakhera stating that his grievance had UKHC010139752026

2026:UHC:7243 been redressed and that he did not wish to pursue the matter any further.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the factum of the application submitted by the petitioner before Police Station Kelakhera.

6. In view of the aforesaid developments and as the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.

7. Accordingly, the present Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Alok Mahra, J.)

14-08-2026 SB

SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b09c12f21822fbd40 bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9BED00E67B5283D 205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.08.17 10:43:14 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead