Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/924/2026 of HARISH KOHLI ALIAS BALAK RAM Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 14 August 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010090922026 BA1/924/2026 Harish Kohli Alias Balak Ram --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr.
SL.
No.
Date
Office
Notes,
reports,
orders or
proceedings
or
directions
and
Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
UKHC010090922026
BA1/924/2026
Harish Kohli Alias Balak Ram
--Applicant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Mahendra Singh Rawat, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. By the instant correction application, the applicant is seeking correction in the order dated 14.08.2026 passed by this Court. He submits that due to typographical error, he could not transcribe the proper section in bail application and consequently, in the order dated 14.08.2026, in place of “Section 64(1) of BNS 2023” “Section 61 (1) of BNS 2023 has been transcribed.
4. Learned State Counsel submits that correction is formal in nature and he has no objection to it.
5. Accordingly, the correction application is allowed.
5. Let in the order dated 14.08.2026, in place of “Section 61(1) of BNS 2023”, “Section 64(1) of BNS 2023” be substituted and this order be treated as part of the order dated 14.08.2026.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 21-08-2026
Parul