Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/750/2026 of TARUN Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 14 August 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010075812026 2026:UHC:7304 UKHC010075812026 BA1/750/2026 Tarun --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010075812026
2026:UHC:7304
UKHC010075812026 BA1/750/2026 Tarun --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Mr. Shashi Kant Shandilya, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. The present applicant – Tarun S/o Shri Naresh Kumar, is praying for bail in reference to FIR dated 22.02.2026 bearing FIR No.47 of 2026, Police Station Doiwala, District Dehradun, wherein, the present applicant is chargesheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 121 (2), 132, 324 (4) and 352 of BNS, 2023.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated, and even otherwise as per the FIR, the incident appears to be an accident and so far as the injuries are concerned, though some of the injuries are grave in nature i.e. only because of fracture and remaining injuries are simple in nature. Apart from this, he submits that the chargesheet has already been filed and the present applicant is languishing in jail since 22.02.2026 and has no criminal antecedents.
5. On the other side, learned AGA have not disputed that the chargesheet has already been filed and the present applicant has no criminal antecedents, however, he submits that after collecting all the credible evidences, the chargesheet has been filed.
6. After hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, and taking into consideration that the chargesheet has already been filed in the matter, and the applicant is languishing in jail since 22.02.2026, and have no criminal antecedents, therefore, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant – “Tarun”, be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
14.08.2026 Nitesh/