Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/1646/2026 of AARADHYA BAJPAYI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 13 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/1646/2026 Aaradhya Bajpayi --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. M.K. Goyal,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010145302026
2026:UHC:7219 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL/1646/2026
Aaradhya Bajpayi --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. M.K. Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Akshay Latwal, A.G.A. and Mr. Nikhil Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
2. Petitioners have approached this Court seeking the following relief:
“A. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus directing the respondent no.1 to 3 to provide protection to the life and personal liberty of petitioners from respondent no.4, his relatives and associates.”
3. It is submitted that both the petitioners belong to the same faith, and that the petitioners developed a liking for each other, which has ended in marriage, and now both the petitioners are living together. Since the father of petitioner no.1 (respondent no.4) is against this marriage, he is giving out threats to kill both the petitioners. Petitioners submit that they are facing stiff resistance, and they seriously apprehend threat to their life and limb from the respondent no.4, and hence they are before this Court praying for protection. It is further submitted that the petitioners are residing together as husband and wife.
4. Learned State Counsel submits that
UKHC010145302026
2026:UHC:7219 petitioners have neither moved any application before the Station House Officer, Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar nor approached the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Udham Singh Nagar seeking appropriate protection and have directly approached this Court.
5. The documents on record reveal that both the petitioners are majors, and it is also submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that the parties have performed marriage according to Hindu Rites and Rituals on 27.07.2026 in a temple.
6. In that view of the matter, and in view of the ruling of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs State of U.P. and another, (2006) 5 SCC 475, the petitioners have made out a case for grant of protection.
7. The Station House Officer, Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar is directed to assess the threat, if any, to the life and limb of the petitioners, and provide necessary protection, if it is found that there is a threat to the life and limb of the petitioners. The S.H.O. is further directed to summon the private respondent, and such other persons, who are inimically placed towards the marriage of the petitioners, and counsel them, in accordance with law.
8. The writ petition stands ordered accordingly.
(Alok Mahra, J.)
13.08.2026 Arpan
ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a20dddb7 393398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109CB987446 351E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2026.08.13 17:04:10 +05'30'