Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1374/2026 of JUBAIR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 13 August 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010139692026 2026:UHC:7199 UKHC010139692026 BA1/1374/2026 Jubair --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010139692026
2026:UHC:7199
UKHC010139692026 BA1/1374/2026 Jubair --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. The instant bail application is moved on behalf of the applicant – Jubair S/o Abid Hasan, seeking regular bail in reference to FIR dated 14.07.2026 bearing FIR No.254 of 2026, Police Station Kotwali Gangnahar, District Haridwar, wherein, the present applicant has been implicated for the offence punishable under Sections 8/21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
4. Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder, for the State raise a serious objections that in the chart as mentioned in paragraph 3, the applicant deliberately have suppressed about his criminal antecedents though as a matter of fact as per the order rejecting the bail application passed by the learned Special Judge (NDPS Act)/1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Roorkee, District Haridwar, in paragraph 5, it is clearly mentioned that the applicant have a criminal antecedents of one case i.e. Case Crime No.646 of 2023, that too relates to the NDPS Act.
5. Since in the chart, the applicant have suppressed about his criminal antecedents, therefore, the instant bail application is dismissed due to such suppression.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
13.08.2026 Nitesh/