Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/84/2025 of PURAN RAM AGRI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 13 August 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 13th August, 2026 WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 84 OF 2025 Puran Ram Agri --Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Uttarakhand, through Principal
UKHC010024872025
2026:UHC:7208-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
13th August, 2026
WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 84 OF 2025
Puran Ram Agri
--Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State Of Uttarakhand, through Principal Secretary, Rural Development, Dehradun.
2. District Magistrate, District Pithoragarh.
3. Chief Executive Engineer, Construction Division, Public Works Department, Berinag, Pithoragarh. ---Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner
: Sri Harsh Taneja & Sri Pramod Kumar, learned counsel. Counsel for the respondents
: Sri G.D. Kandpal, learned Additional Advocate General with Sri M.S. Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
JUDGMENT : (PER: SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.)
1. The present writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief:- “(A) issue writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent nos. 2 & 3 to take appropriate action to complete the construction work of the road of Bhaatgara, Fadiyali, Nayal and Pabhya in Tehsil Berinag, District Pithoragarh, Uttarakhand forthwith within stipulated period.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during pendency of the writ petition, an inspection of the site was made by the officials and in which, the villagers and the officials arrived at certain consensus. He submits that in view of the same, the matter does not survive.
UKHC010024872025
2026:UHC:7208-DB
3. Accordingly, the proceedings of the instant petition are closed.
4. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly.
_____________________ MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.
___________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
Dt: 13th August, 2026 Rathour
PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Digitally signed by PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=23699ccc2fd40ad81b6fd13323779d9e3aeb109 7d17dbb53d481cabd25946eed, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=1F65499E931DF71CDAF92A40CC6179B8 E010331BA695239171F906FD5C45C4E8, cn=PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Date: 2026.08.17 14:30:18 +05'30'