Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/366/2026 of MASOOM Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 13 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/366/2026 Masoom --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned
UKHC010036182026
2026:UHC:7237
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/366/2026
Masoom
--Applicant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. Present applicant Masoom, S/o Abbas is praying for bail in reference to FIR dated 28.05.2025 bearing FIR No. 0151 of 2025 P.S. Kaliyar Sharif, District Haridwar wherein he has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 115(2) and 352 of BNS 2023.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is languishing in jail since 09.01.2026 and the charge sheet has already been filed and there is no need of further custodial interrogation of the applicant and he has no criminal antecedent, therefore, applicant be released on bail. He further submits that there is no consistency in the statement of the injured. Apart from this there is delay of six days in lodging the FIR but there is no explanation to this.
5. On the other side, Ms. Rangoli Purohit, learned A.G.A. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application by submitting that there is a witness of the incident and the injury is caused by a sharp edged weapon but fairly submits that there is no recovery of UKHC010036182026
2026:UHC:7237 the said weapon from the applicant and also have not disputed that the applicant have no criminal history and the charge sheet has already been filed.
6. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the charge sheet has already been filed and the present applicant is languishing in jail since 09.01.2026 and there is no need of further custodial interrogation of the present applicant, and have no criminal antecedent, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, instant bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant Masoom be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court condition.
9. It is made clear that after being released on bail the applicant shall join the trial court proceeding on each and every date without seeking unnecessary adjournment and shall not indulge in any such criminal activity in future failing which the prosecution is free to move an application for bail cancellation.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
13-08-2026 Parul